View the selected mix: circle + daily check marks →DESIGN LAB · SAMPLE DATA ONLY

THREE WAYS TO SEE YOUR PRACTICE

Same promise. Different perspective.

Compare what helps you act, keep going, and return. Switching designs preserves your sample check-in. Nothing is saved to an account.

Good SirDAILY WINSYour daily practice

ONE PROMISE, EACH DAY

Make room for what matters.

01 · MY CUE

After dinner

Before reaching for my phone.

02 · MY PROMISE

20 minutes, present

Put my phone away and listen.

03 · WHY IT MATTERS

Be a present partner

Make space for real connection.

TODAY’S PROMISE

Put my phone away and listen for 20 minutes.

Your daily record

  1. Day 1Kept
  2. Day 2Kept
  3. Day 3Missed
  4. Day 4Kept
  5. Day 5Missed
  6. Day 6Kept
  7. TodayOpen

4 of 7 promises kept, including today.

Read the design assessment and test plan

Leading hypothesis: version 1 for Today.

This is a design assessment, not a measured behavioral result. Version 1 makes the cue, action and reason easiest to connect. Version 2 is better suited to Progress, and version 3 to a weekly reflection.

Predicted strengths and tradeoffs
Goal1 · Daily path2 · Your rhythm3 · Life taking shape
Know what to do nextStrong: explicit sequencePromise competes with metricsPurpose comes before action
Build confidence from evidenceClear practice and daily markersStrongest completion overviewEmphasizes perceived life impact
Return after a missClear cue and next stepLow total can feel discouragingReason to return stays visible
First-day usefulnessWorks without past dataLittle evidence to visualizeMeaning works; ratings need time

Test with men who match the intended audience

For an initial qualitative round, recruit 6–9 men aged 25–45. Rotate the order of the three designs. Give each person the same tasks: identify the cue and minimum, check in, undo, and find how to return after a miss. Do not show this assessment until afterward.

Record task success, confusion, whether a missed day feels recoverable, and which design they would return to. Small interviews reveal usability problems; they do not prove long-term effectiveness.

Then test the strongest candidates over several weeks with real commitments. Compare sustained follow-through, return after missed obligations, self-reported confidence, and reported life impact. Set the study length and sample size from baseline data before calling a winner.